Ghana’s Attorney-General and Minister for Justice has announced plans to prosecute Bernard Antwi Boasiako, popularly known as Chairman Wontumi, over an alleged GH¢24 million financial loss to the state, in what is shaping up to be one of the most high-profile legal cases involving a prominent political figure in recent times.
The decision, according to official sources, follows investigations into transactions and activities believed to have caused significant financial damage to the state, prompting the Attorney-General’s Department to move forward with criminal prosecution.
Background to the Alleged Case
Chairman Wontumi, who serves as the Ashanti Regional Chairman of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), is a well-known political figure whose influence extends beyond party politics into business and public discourse.
The alleged GH¢24 million loss to the state is reportedly linked to dealings that are currently under scrutiny by state investigative bodies. While details of the transactions are yet to be fully disclosed publicly, authorities say the evidence gathered so far is sufficient to warrant prosecution.
The Attorney-General’s move signals a firm stance on enforcing accountability, particularly in cases involving alleged financial misconduct and state losses.
Attorney-General’s Position
According to information emerging from the Attorney-General’s office, the decision to prosecute is grounded in the principle that no individual is above the law, regardless of political affiliation or status.
Officials emphasize that the prosecution process will follow due process, allowing the courts to independently assess the evidence and determine responsibility based on the law.
Legal analysts note that cases involving alleged financial loss to the state often involve complex documentation, forensic accounting, and prolonged legal proceedings, making transparency and judicial independence critical to public confidence.
Political and Public Reactions
News of the impending prosecution has sparked widespread reactions across Ghana’s political landscape. Supporters of the move view it as a demonstration of government’s commitment to fighting corruption and safeguarding public resources.
Others, however, have urged caution, calling for the legal process to remain free from political interference and public speculation. They stress the importance of allowing the courts to determine the matter based strictly on evidence.
Civil society groups have also weighed in, calling for consistent application of the law across all cases involving alleged state losses, irrespective of political connections.
Chairman Wontumi Yet to Respond in Detail
As of the time of filing this report, Chairman Wontumi has not issued a detailed public response addressing the specific allegations surrounding the GH¢24 million loss to the state. However, close associates suggest he is expected to challenge the claims through legal channels.
In previous public engagements on unrelated matters, Chairman Wontumi has often maintained his innocence when accused of wrongdoing, insisting on his right to fair hearing and due process.
Observers expect that his legal team will soon issue an official statement responding to the Attorney-General’s decision.
Implications for Ghana’s Anti-Corruption Drive
The case is being closely watched as a test of Ghana’s broader anti-corruption and accountability framework. Financial loss to the state cases have historically attracted public interest due to their implications for governance, public trust, and economic stability.
Legal experts point out that successful prosecution of such cases requires strong evidence, prosecutorial independence, and judicial efficiency. They add that outcomes of high-profile cases often influence public perception of the justice system.
If the case proceeds as announced, it could set important legal and political precedents regarding accountability and enforcement of financial laws in Ghana.
Legal Process and What Comes Next
Once formal charges are filed, Chairman Wontumi is expected to be arraigned before a competent court, where the prosecution will outline the allegations and supporting evidence. The defence will then have the opportunity to respond, file motions, and challenge the case.
Depending on the nature of the charges, the case could involve multiple hearings and potentially extend over a significant period.
Legal practitioners caution against drawing conclusions before the court proceedings, emphasizing the constitutional presumption of innocence until proven guilty.
Developing Story
This is a developing story, and further details are expected to emerge as the Attorney-General’s Department formally initiates prosecution and releases additional information regarding the alleged GH¢24 million loss to the state.
My News Ghana will continue to monitor the case closely and provide updates as verified facts become available.
About the Author
